7 Reasons Local Churches Should Remove Non-Attending Members from Their Membership

On Sunday, July 26, 2020, the assembled congregation of First Baptist Church of Diana, TX, spent two hours discussing and voting on more than 400 absentee church members. This meeting came after our lengthy and overt attempts to reconnect with persistently non-attending church members. It was also the culmination of various conversations, teachings, and sermons on the topic of meaningful church membership as part of what it means to live as a Christian in the world.

We’ve been talking about church health and striving to become a healthier church for years, and this was a big step in that direction.

But let me put this qualifying statement right up front: You should absolutely NOT seek to remove non-attending members from your church roster if you haven’t done your due diligence beforehand. A “clean” roster is not the primary goal. We want to understand and practice meaningful membership as a church family, not just impose a ruling from on high.

As you and your church move toward greater health, and as meaningful church membership becomes more readily recognizable, then at some point you’ll be ready to take steps toward addressing your non-attending members. Removing absentee members from the roster will be hard, it will cost you relational credit, and it will require a lot of effort on the part of the pastors and members who understand the importance of doing such a thing. But anything truly worth doing in this world is going to be hard and costly.

The following content is what I published for the benefit of the members of First Baptist Church of Diana. The purpose of this content was to teach more on the topic, prepare the members for the meeting, and help church members know better how to think and talk about this subject.

Over the course of the last several months, in anticipation of the meeting we had among our church last Sunday, I heard some people raise objections to our planned action. I’d like to use these objections as a way to argue in favor of forging ahead, with the caveat above in mind. Here are seven objections and seven accompanying reasons why I believe local churches should remove non-attending members from their roster.

1. You’re kicking people out!

Both non-attending members and other people in the community are likely to percieve your action as a negative one. However, persistently non-attending members have already kicked themselves out. They have removed themselves from any meaningful relationships among the existing church family.

The local church who removes absentee members from the roster is merely acknowledging on paper what is already true in reality, and absentee members need to realize what they are doing to themselves. Therefore, local churches should remove non-attending members in order to help them understand that they have already effectively removed or excommunicated themselves.

2. We should ask them nicely, not give them ultimatums.

No one likes an ultimatum, since it essentially demands a decisive change. Ultimatums draw a clear line in the sand and force everyone to choose a side. But, at the end of the day, church membership is either going to be meaningful for your local church or it is not. And every local church is eventually going to have to draw the line and force the decision. Otherwise, “church member” will continue to be a meaningless status.

Furthermore, the demand for meaningful church membership should only come after reasonable attempts have been made to extend love and friendship. As I said above, every church should do the due diligence of teaching about membership, reaching out to those who are inactive, and initiating conversations among active members in order to ensure that everyone understands what is happening and why.

At some point, however, a decision has to be made. Therefore, local churches should remove non-attending members in order to reestablish the basic commitment of church membership – regular attendance.

3. Maybe they will start attending again later.

One of the main reasons people resist the idea of removing non-attending church members is that they hold onto the hope that absentee members will eventually return. But this wrongly assumes that removing someone from the membership roster necessarily bars that person from attending church services or prevents them from joining again in the future.

If your church is like mine, then anyone is welcome to attend most all of the services. Previous members who have been removed for non-attendance will be welcomed at regular church gatherings with open arms. And if they decide those removed members want to join again in the future, then we would gladly move in that direction… after, of course, we made it clear that attendance remains a basic expectation.

Local churches should remove non-attending members so that the expectation of regular attendance will be clear if-and-when those removed members ever do come back again.

4. Maybe they are attending another church.

If non-attending members are regularly attending another church, then that’s great! It’s far better that a professing Christian gather regularly with a local church than to flounder about in isolation from Christ’s visible body in the world. But a Christian should be a member of whatever church he or she is regularly attending. That’s the church family who will know him or her best, and the pastors he or she sees regularly will be far more capable of giving quality shepherding care.

Local churches should remove non-attending members so that they will feel compelled to join formally with the church they regularly attend.

5. They have been members here for so long.

Long-time church members can be a marvelous feature of a local church. Members who have been participating with the same church family for decades will often have a kind of relational capital that is hard to come by. These stalwarts of the church and of the community can sometimes personify the best among us.

But one of the main responsiblities older church members have is to give themselves to discipling efforts among younger members (Titus 2:1-10). Older members are responsible to provide examples of Christian virtue and endurance for those younger Christians who are coming up behind them.

Local churches should remove non-attending church members so that younger Christians will know that absentee Christianity is not something to emulate. 

6. These non-attending members are my family!

Many Christians in the Bible-Belt (the American south) have family members who once professed faith in Christ but do not live in any meaningful sense today as followers of Jesus. The difficulties and strains of family relationships can easily compound the seeming difficulty of having candid conversations about spiritual health and church membership with a family member.

But who should love your mom or dad, or your brother or sister, or your cousin, or your aunt or uncle, or your niece or nephew more than you? And who is better suited to address their inconsistent profession of faith in Christ than you are? If your family members says he or she loves Jesus, but lives like a non-Christian in the world, then you are the person who sees and knows this false dichotomy better than anyone else.

Local churches should remove non-attending members in order to make them understand that God doesn’t have any nieces or nephews or grandchildren. God only has children, which are those adopted into His family by virtue of their union with Christ. And the ordinary way such a union is visible in the world is by their ongoing union with other Christians in the context of the local church.

7. This will make them think Christians are judgmental and legalistic.

When Christians make unpopular judgments, the world is quick to accuse them of being judgmental. Moreover, Christians have often been legalistic, and that’s a shame. But, there is a vast difference between being judgmental and making proper judgments.

Christians must never judge superficially, on the basis of socio-economic class or race, for example. But Christ Himself commands Christians to judge one another in matters of morality and obligation. In Scripture, it is clear that “those inside the church” (i.e. professing Christians) are exaclty the ones Christians are to judge with greater severity and expecation when it comes to their morality (1 Corinthians 5:9-13).

When Christians speak the truth in love, they will certainly open themselves up to being misunderstood, but this in no way relieves them of the duty to speak the truth and to make biblical judgments. Local churches should remove non-attending members so that those inside and those outside the church will have the practice of biblical judgment modeled for them in a public and obvious way.

In conclusion, non-attending members are not good for a local church. Allowing persitently non-attending members to remain on the church membership roster gives Christians and non-Christians alike the wrong idea about what it means to believe and follow Jesus Christ. Local churches should acknowldge “inactive church membership” as a problem to be solved or as a disease to be medicated or as a dysfunction to be rehabilitated.

Let me offer you (especially if you are a fellow pastor) a caution and an encouragement.

A caution: If you want to follow Christ in this world, as an individual or as an assembly of believers (i.e. a church), then you are going to face challenges and difficulties. The road to the celestial city has many off-ramps and enticing stops along the way. You’ll have good reasons to avoid obedience to Christ as you consider the commands of Scripture. But don’t be fooled. The allure of disobedience is a sham, and it will neither satisfy nor endure.

An encouragement: If you do follow in obedience to Christ in this world, even doing the hard things that very few seem to appreciate, then you will enjoy all of the benefits He’s promised you. Jesus Himself will be with you every step of the way (Matthew 28:18-20). Your efforts for righteousness and obedience will be rewarded (James 1:12; 1 Corinthians 9:25; 1 Peter 5:1-4). And, especially for those who lead as pastors, you’ll not be ashamed when you stand before the King to give an account (Hebrews 13:17).

May God help us to trust in the finished work of Jesus Christ, and may He help us to live in grateful obedience to Him. May He also grant us much fruit from our efforts to see healthier churches comprised of committed members.

Author: marcminter

Marc Minter is the Senior Pastor of First Baptist Church of Diana, TX. He and his wife, Cassie, have two sons, Micah and Malachi.

13 thoughts on “7 Reasons Local Churches Should Remove Non-Attending Members from Their Membership”

  1. If non-attending members are attending another church (like-faith), what is the process of those non-attending members to be a member of that other church?
    I know some people who were bound/excommunicated due to unfaithfulness, who are being put away by families as they are told not to keep company with them.

    1. Eimee, thanks for reading, and thanks for the good questions.

      First, becoming a member of another church is not necessarily a bad thing. In my own church, we would be happy to remove a member in good standing and know that they are joined with another church that will disciple them and benefit from their investments as well.

      Second, I am sorry to hear that you’ve known some people to shun their family members after an excommunication. I can’t possibly know the details, but I pray that Christ will help you to honor His commands and to love His people (fellow Christians) through difficult situations which necessitate discipline.

      Again, thanks for reading.

  2. I am a member but with no transportation anymore I have no other way to attend, and now having medical restraints my fellowship comes by phone or cards, once awhile a visit. Problem is expanded in that in 2011 I fell into sin and went to prison, I was hurt by the unforgiveness after 38 years, I wish churches would forgive there members past sins. I’m 62 ,never married and would love the fellowship of the saints.

    1. Michael, I’m sorry for the negative experiences you’ve had and for the ongoing hurt you have.

      From this distance, and because I do not know you or your situation, I cannot give more meaningful counsel than to encourage you to find a healthy church, talk with the pastor or pastors there, and see what he/they might say about how to connect you to the church and the means of grace.

      May God grant you grace, and may you strive to know and follow Christ.

  3. Why not just continue to love people and reach out periodically. Membership isn’t even a thing in the bible. ‘kicking’ someone out (which is what your are meanly doing) only makes room for mental-health stress. Please STOP making church a ‘business’. Get rid of all your pretences.

    1. Hello there. Thanks for reading and for taking the time to comment.

      As you might expect, I disagree with you on this… but I do wonder how you arrive at the conclusion that churches can and do “bring members in,” but you deny a church’s responsibility or authority to “put members out.”

      I also wonder how you can speak so confidently about (1) membership being absent from the Bible, (2) my apparent motives, and (3) the influence of “business” upon a church that practices the sort of discipline of which I wrote in this article. Your statements reveal a complete ignorance on your part of Christian history and the Bible’s teaching on this subject. This is not to mention the fact that you can hardly know my (or my church’s) motives without first knowing anything about me/us.

      Again, I appreciate the time you’ve spent reading this article and interacting with me… but I recommend that you save comments like this for rants on social media. If you really want to engage on the topic, I’d be happy to do that.

  4. What do the scriptures say that’s all that really matters I’m not trying to kick people out of the church I have nothing to do with that but what does the almighty Lord God say that’s what we should do

    1. 1 Corinthians 5:4–13 (ESV)

      4 When you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, 5 you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord…

      9 I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people— 10 not at all meaning the sexually immoral of this world, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world.

      11 But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler—not even to eat with such a one. 12 For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Is it not those inside the church whom you are to judge? 13 God judges those outside. “Purge the evil person from among you.”

  5. Hi Marc,

    Thanks for this helpful and thoughtful article.

    What criteria did you use to evaluate removal from the rolls? Was it mainly a period of time, or other factors?

    Thanks for your work to the Body.

    YbiC,

    Jon

    1. Thanks, Jon!

      For this first effort to begin practicing meaningful membership again at our church, we removed all current non-attending members who (1) were not known to have joined or have not expressed the intention to join another gospel-believing church and (2) had not expressed their intention to recommit to active membership with us.

      Since this was the first time for us to do such a thing in more than 70 years, all those we removed had been absent or inactive for quite a long time… most for more than a decade.

      I’d be happy to discuss procedure and pastoral concerns more if you’d like. Send me an email at marc@fbcdiana.org, and I’ll give you my cell.

  6. “I also wonder how you can speak so confidently about (1) membership being absent from the Bible, (2) my apparent motives, and (3) the influence of “business” upon a church that practices the sort of discipline of which I wrote in this article. Your statements reveal a complete ignorance on your part of Christian history and the Bible’s teaching on this subject. This is not to mention the fact that you can hardly know my (or my church’s) motives without first knowing anything about me/us.“

    This is so telling. This has nothing to do with you. Membership is completely absent from Christianity because it’s a belief system. You either believe and participate or you don’t. Anyone who tries to quantify participation or belief is playing God themselves. The discipline is from God. This isn’t business behavior as much as clubhouse behavior that is on the path of a becoming a cult.

    The motives are irrelevant. The behavior is enough to shine light on this kind of blasphemous church. Sad because today the world could definitely use growth and spreading the word of God and instead it’s stifled by mortals playing God themselves.

  7. Excellent article brother. Our church has had to recently consider removing someone from membership for non-attendance as an act of formal discipline. We have told it to the church and we have given the church time to pray and pursue this person, but the individual has not responded. In this context (since this person is not attending the church already), in your opinion, what does it mean to treat this person as a Gentile and a tax-collector? My inclination is that, at the very least, that we would both pray for this person as if they are lost and treat them as if they are lost – meaning, any future interactions with them we would seek to have gospel conversations with them as we should seek to do so with any lost person, expressing concern for their soul.

    1. Hello, Steve.

      Thanks for reading. Sorry to hear of the church discipline case. May the Lord grant you and the rest of your church wisdom and grace. And may He grant the erring and absentee church member repentance.

      The “Gentile & tax collector” language is covenantal. This means that the church is to treat the one being put out or removed as one who is outside of the New Covenant. Of course, this means barring from the Lord’s Supper and any other privilege of church membership, and it also means that the remaining members should pray for and work toward the disciplined person’s conversion. Only God can grant the gifts of repentance and faith, but we can and should pray for and strive for seeing such gifts applied in a person’s life.

      It is also important to note (I think) that the act of public church discipline is itself a strong effort to see an unrepentant sinner converted. When an entire church publicly withdraws their affirmation of one’s profession of faith, this is an occasion of grave consideration on the part of the one being removed from church membership. He or she is no effectively hearing the voice of Christ in the combined voices of a local congregation, saying, “Every indication is that you are not a Christian and that you are under condemnation and not grace. Repent! Before it’s too late!”

      For further reading on this subject, there are many great resources. I recommend (for its brevity and clarity) Jonathan Leeman’s book, Church Discipline https://www.amazon.com/dp/1433532336?ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_1R4GVC6Z0HVDET0F3D33

Leave a comment